Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45376
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnoll, Martinen_US
dc.contributor.authorZloczysti, Petraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-24en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-05T10:04:46Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-05T10:04:46Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/45376-
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses the validity of the perception-based governance indicators used by the US Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) for aid allocation decisions. By conducting Explanatory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of data from 1996 to 2009, we find that although the MCA purports to measure seven distinct dimensions of governance, only two discrete underlying dimensions, the 'participatory dimension of governance' and the 'overall quality of governance' can be identified. Our results also show that some of the doubts that have been raised concerning the validity of perception-based governance indicators are less warranted when the indicators are applied exclusively to developing countries.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aFreie Univ., Fachbereich Wirtschaftswiss. |cBerlinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aSchool of Business & Economics Discussion Paper: Economics |x2011/2en_US
dc.subject.jelC38en_US
dc.subject.jelF35en_US
dc.subject.jelO10en_US
dc.subject.jelO51en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordAid Allocationen_US
dc.subject.keywordGovernance Indicatorsen_US
dc.subject.keywordFactor Analysisen_US
dc.subject.keywordMCAen_US
dc.titleThe Good Governance Indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: How many dimensions are really being measureden_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn654796564en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:fubsbe:20112-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
503.56 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.