EconStor >
Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ), Leipzig >
UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45252
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGawel, Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorBernsen, Kristinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-28T14:45:40Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-28T14:45:40Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/45252-
dc.description.abstractSo-called virtual water, the water embedded in internationally traded goods, has come under discussion. The amount of quantitative studies which attempt to estimate volumes and flows of virtual water in relation to agricultural trade is rising rapidly, while the concept has been recognized by large firms and international institutions. From the viewpoint of economic trade theory, the endowment with abundant water resources gives countries a comparative advantage in the export of waterintensive goods, while water scarce countries gain the option to alleviate stress on domestic water resources by substituting the production of water-intensive goods by imports. However, fairness implications are seen to arise in the reallocation of water resources through the means of mostly agricultural trade. In this perspective, moral problems can be attached to both imports and exports, and even to a country's own consumption of virtual water. Global institutional arrangements are therefore suggested, to regulate virtual water flows in a "fair" and "efficient" manner. This paper will give a short overview of the concept's history and findings, and subsequently analyse it from the perspective of economic trade and resource theory. The contribution of this paper will be to examine the concept of virtual water in terms of the problems it evokes, its informative value and the policy suggestions which are made in this context. It must be concluded that the concept is unspecific and inconsistent, implying governance schemes which will neither improve efficiency nor sustainability in today's trade patterns.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUFZ Leipzigen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUFZ-Diskussionspapiere 1/2011en_US
dc.subject.jelF18en_US
dc.subject.jelQ25en_US
dc.subject.jelQ27en_US
dc.subject.jelQ56en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordvirtual wateren_US
dc.subject.keywordwater footprinten_US
dc.subject.keywordinternational tradeen_US
dc.subject.keywordglobal water governanceen_US
dc.titleWhat is wrong with virtual water trading?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn656989289-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ufzdps:12011-
Appears in Collections:UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201101.pdf420.13 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.