EconStor >
Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ), Leipzig >
UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44752
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHorlemann, Lenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDombrowsky, Inesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-11T13:27:22Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-11T13:27:22Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/44752-
dc.description.abstractIntegrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) forms the widely accepted ecosystem approach to manage water and its related resources in a sustainable way. Nevertheless its implementation is still lacking behind, especially in developing and transition countries which are often short of essential resources and face complex political dynamics. IWRM often requires a fundamental realignment of institutions and governance structures. This may lead to problems of fit and institutional interplay as particular challenges of multi-level governance. Against this background a case study of Mongolia was carried out, a transition country suffering from extreme climatic conditions and increasing depletion of its resources. While an attempt to introduce IWRM exists on paper, it is less clear how it will be made politically and institutionally applicable. A document review and stakeholder interviews were carried out in order understand progress and problems of introducing IWRM in Mongolia in the face of its transition and decentralization process. Problems of fit and interplay were identified as well as approaches for their solution. Results show that the decentralization itself has led to problems of fit and interplay. Attempts are underway to overcome problems of fit like the establishment of river basin councils which do now face challenges concerning their room for manoeuvre. Problems of interplay arise when it comes to the cooperation and coordination of numerous water related organisations which often leads to inconsistent water governance. Newly established posts are often endowed with little resources for enforcement.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUFZ Leipzigen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUFZ-Diskussionspapiere 9/2010en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordIWRMen_US
dc.subject.keywordproblems of fit and interplayen_US
dc.subject.keywordinstitutionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordtransition countriesen_US
dc.subject.keywordMongoliaen_US
dc.subject.stwTrinkwasseren_US
dc.subject.stwWasserpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwGovernance-Ansatzen_US
dc.subject.stwInstitutionalismusen_US
dc.subject.stwEinführungen_US
dc.subject.stwÜbergangswirtschaften_US
dc.subject.stwMongoleien_US
dc.titleInstitutionalizing IWRM in developing and transition countries: The case of Mongoliaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn634463314en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ufzdps:92010-
Appears in Collections:UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
634463314.pdf968.69 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.