EconStor >
Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen >
DIIS Working Papers, Danish Institute for International Studies >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44626
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKratochwil, Friedrichen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-08T09:05:41Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-08T09:05:41Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-87-7605-430-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/44626-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the changing meaning of 'territoriality' by focusing on the problem of representation. It examines the two-dimensional homogenous space as it has been increasingly used in 'mapping' the international system as an area of mutually exclusive zones of jurisdiction. This way of mapping has reinforced the notion of 'sovereignty' as exclusion, despite the growth of competing jurisdictional claims based on a variety of principles, which the emergence of private international law attempted to mediate during the heydays of the nation state. It also placed international regimes and international organizations 'above' the state where they became 'invisible', thereby again reinforcing the territorial conception of law and politics. The new systems theory of Niklas Luhmann and Gunther Teubner claims to provide a better representation of contemporary social and political reality, as it no longer uses the part/whole distinction as its main conceptual tool and is thus more open to 'legal pluralism' both domestically and internationally. Nevertheless, the conceptualization of autonomous functional systems does not do justice to the special role that law plays in constituting and transforming these supposedly autonomous 'auto-poietic' systems. For that reason the new systems theory fails to address also problems of non-territorial 'imperial' formations as evidenced by the political project of 'governance' and 'best practices', universal human rights, and extra-territorial regulation as exemplified e.g. by the European REACH initiative and the EU's neighborhood policy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDansk Institut for Internationale Studier Copenhagenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDIIS working paper 2011:03en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleOf maps, law, and politics: An inquiry into the changing meaning of territorialityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn647472775en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:DIIS Working Papers, Danish Institute for International Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
647472775.pdf293 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.