EconStor >
Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen >
DIIS Working Papers, Danish Institute for International Studies >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMandøe Glæsner, Nielsen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study takes off by demonstrating how the ability of the state to define the difference between ordinary crime and terrorism, both historically and conceptually, is rootet in an immanent power reserve, which the sovereign state carries within from its founding. The paper links this power reserve, ultimately based on violence in the state of emergency, with the juridical language of the sovereign state. After drawing up this theoretical framework for the state's monopoly of the legal definition - based foremost on the thoughts of Carl Schmitt and Walter Benjamin - the paper thoroughly maps the legal anti terrorism measures taken in UK and Denmark. Through this study it is shown how to understand the unspecific language used in the anti terror laws, of a way of managing the state's monopoly of definition in the light of the threat of terrorism.en_US
dc.publisherDanish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) Copenhagenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDIIS working paper 2010:01en_US
dc.subject.stwPolitische Gewalten_US
dc.subject.stwNationale Sicherheiten_US
dc.subject.stwInnere Sicherheiten_US
dc.titleRetsstat, magtstat og suverænstat: Terrorlovgivninger i perspektiven_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:DIIS Working Papers, Danish Institute for International Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
617771456.pdf293.24 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.