Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44615
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMandøe Glæsner, Nielsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-16en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-08T09:05:29Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-08T09:05:29Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-87-7605-368-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/44615-
dc.description.abstractThis study takes off by demonstrating how the ability of the state to define the difference between ordinary crime and terrorism, both historically and conceptually, is rootet in an immanent power reserve, which the sovereign state carries within from its founding. The paper links this power reserve, ultimately based on violence in the state of emergency, with the juridical language of the sovereign state. After drawing up this theoretical framework for the state's monopoly of the legal definition - based foremost on the thoughts of Carl Schmitt and Walter Benjamin - the paper thoroughly maps the legal anti terrorism measures taken in UK and Denmark. Through this study it is shown how to understand the unspecific language used in the anti terror laws, of a way of managing the state's monopoly of definition in the light of the threat of terrorism.en_US
dc.language.isodanen_US
dc.publisher|aDanish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) |cCopenhagenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDIIS working paper |x2010:01en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwStaatstheorieen_US
dc.subject.stwPolitische Gewalten_US
dc.subject.stwNationale Sicherheiten_US
dc.subject.stwInnere Sicherheiten_US
dc.subject.stwDänemarken_US
dc.titleRetsstat, magtstat og suverænstat: Terrorlovgivninger i perspektiven_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn617771456en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
293.24 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.