EconStor >
Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration >
Discussion Papers, Institute for European Integration, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44429
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKarnups, Viesturs Paulsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-08T12:19:08Z-
dc.date.available2011-03-08T12:19:08Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/44429-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines Latvia's foreign trade and investment relations with Germany and Russia during the interwar period and the period after the restoration of independence up to now. During the period between the two world wars Latvia's foreign trade was completely integrated into the European trade systems at that time. One of Latvia's main trading partners was Germany, whilst trade with Russia (USSR) was minimal. The reorientation of Latvian trade to the West after regaining independence in 1991 meant the reestablishment of links with Germany, as well as the maintenance of links to Russia. In comparison to the pre-war period, Latvia's foreign trade is no longer dominated by Germany, whilst trade with Russia is at a much higher level than in the interwar period. Trade with Germany in 2008 made up 11.1% of Latvia's total trade while trade with Russia accounted for 10.5%.The structure of trade has also changed particularly in relation to Germany and to a lesser degree with Russia. Pre-war Latvia's exports to Germany were mainly agricultural and forestry products; today they consist of manufactured goods and forestry products. Exports to Russia in the interwar period were mainly manufactured goods, but today exports consist of manufactured goods as well as food processing products. In terms of investments, pre-war investment from Russia (USSR) in Latvia was negligible, whilst the largest investor in Latvia was Germany. In 2008 Germany was the 10th largest investor in Latvia (3.6%), whilst Russia was on the 7th position (5.6%). Thus, whilst the role of Germany in terms of trade had decreased substantially since the interwar period Russia's role has increased both in terms of trade and investment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEuropa-Kolleg Hamburgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper // Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration 4/10en_US
dc.subject.jelE22en_US
dc.subject.jelF10en_US
dc.subject.jelF21en_US
dc.subject.jelF53en_US
dc.subject.jelN70en_US
dc.subject.ddc320en_US
dc.subject.keywordLatviaen_US
dc.subject.keywordGermanyen_US
dc.subject.keywordRussiaen_US
dc.subject.keywordInterwar perioden_US
dc.subject.keywordforeign tradeen_US
dc.subject.keywordinvestmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordpost-independenceen_US
dc.titleLatvian foreign trade and investment with Germany and Russia: past and presenten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn63542567Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ekhdps:410-
Appears in Collections:Discussion Papers, Institute for European Integration, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
63542567X.pdf445.04 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.