Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/43507 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Nota di Lavoro No. 2010,103
Publisher: 
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
Abstract: 
This paper studies the delegation of activities that pose serious risks to health and the environment in an economy regulated by strict liability schemes. Strict liability induces judgment-proof possibilities. Two civil liability regimes are then compared: a strict liability scheme and a capped strict liability one. The argument is led under a twofold asymmetric information assumption between the principal and the agent: the efficiency level in effort for safety and the agent's level of wealth. The paper shows that standard strict liability under information asymmetries deters the efficient agent to compete and favors adverse selection. Then, under conditions, a capped strict liability regime is a better regime than a standard strict liability one because it induces the efficient agent to supply the level of safety effort equivalent to the first best solution. The counterpart is the perception of an informational rent by the efficient agent. At the optimum, this rent is minimized by the efficient contract supplied by the principal.
Subjects: 
Environment
Strict Liability
Ex-Ante Regulation
Ex-Post Liability
Judgment-Proof
Environment Law
CERCLA
Environmental Liability
JEL: 
K0
K32
Q01
Q58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
275.49 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.