|
EconStor >
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen >
cege - Centrum für Europa-, Governance- und Entwicklungsforschung, Universität Göttingen >
cege-Diskussionspapiere, Universität Göttingen >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41573
|
| | |
| Title: | | Are 'new' donors different? Comparing the allocation of bilateral aid between non-DAC and DAC donor  |
| Authors: | | Dreher, Axel Nunnenkamp, Peter Thiele, Rainer |
| Issue Date: | | 2010 |
| Series/Report no.: | | Discussion papers // CeGE 96 |
| Abstract: | | Major DAC donors are widely criticized for weak targeting of aid, selfish aid motives and insufficient coordination. The emergence of an increasing number of new donors may further complicate the coordination of international aid efforts. On the other hand, new donors (many of which were aid recipients until recently) may have competitive advantages in allocating aid according to need and merit. Project-level data on aid by new donors, as collected by the PLAID initiative, allow for empirical analyses comparing the allocation behavior of new versus old donors. We employ Probit and Tobit models and test for significant differences in the distribution of aid by new and old donors across recipient countries. We find that new donors (i) focus on closer neighbors, (ii) care less for recipient need, (iii) exhibit a weaker bias towards badly governed countries, (iv) respond to disasters, but with fewer resources than old donors, and (v) do not pursue commercial self interest. |
| Subjects: | | aid allocation new donors donor motives Probit Tobit |
| JEL: | | F35 |
| Document Type: | | Working Paper |
| Appears in Collections: | | Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des IfW Economists Online cege-Diskussionspapiere, Universität Göttingen
|
| Files in This Item:
| |
|
| No. of Downloads:
| |
| last Month |
last 3 Month |
total |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | |
Download bibliographical data as:
BibTeX
|
| |
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41573
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|