EconStor >
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen >
cege - Centrum für Europa-, Governance- und Entwicklungsforschung, Universität Göttingen >
cege-Diskussionspapiere, Universität Göttingen >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41572
  
Title:Why it pays for aid recipients to take note of the millennium challenge corporation: Other donors do! PDF Logo
Authors:Dreher, Axel
Nunnenkamp, Peter
Öhler, Hannes
Issue Date:2010
Series/Report no.:Discussion papers // CeGE 99
Abstract:It is widely believed that the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) has grossly fallen short of high expectations raised by the Bush administration in 2002. From the perspective of potential recipient countries, the crucial issue is whether the MCC increased the overall pool of aid resources available to them. We argue that this question extends far beyond the distribution of the limited MCC resources. By employing OLS and treatmenteffects estimations, we assess how other US aid agencies and non-US donors reacted to MCC decisions. We find that positive signaling effects tend to dominate possible substitution effects not only for overall US aid but also for multilateral donors. Regarding other bilateral donors the evidence is mixed.
Subjects:official development aid
Millennium Challenge Corporation
additionality
signaling
United States
other DAC donors
JEL:F35
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:cege-Diskussionspapiere, Universität Göttingen
Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des IfW

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
623719320.pdf185.89 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41572

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.