EconStor >
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) >
Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) >
Working Paper Series in Economics, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41475
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTangian, Andranik S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-05en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-08T11:27:30Z-
dc.date.available2010-11-08T11:27:30Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:swb:90-206160-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/41475-
dc.description.abstractFive German leading parties and their coalitions are evaluated from the viewpoint of direct democracy. For this purpose, the positions of the parties on over 30 topical issues are compared with the results of polls of public opinion. The outcomes are summarized in the indices of popularity and universality of the parties and of the DGB (German Confederation of Trade Unions). The selection of policy issues and the information on the party positions are given as in the Wahl-O-Mat(2010) for the last Bundestag (German parliamentary) elections 2009. It is shown that the Bundestag election winner 2009 - the conservative party CDU/CSU with 33.8% votes - has a quite low representative capacity (fourth among the five leading parties), whereas the most representative is the left party Linke which received only 11.9% votes. As for possible coalitions, the most representative would consist of the Linke and the ecologists Grünen, who received together 22.6% votes and could not make a government. It is noteworthy that the DGB is also top evaluated as a good representative of majority opinions. The analysis of Bundestag elections 2009 shows that the voters are little consistent with their own political profiles, disregard party manifestos, and are likely driven by political traditions, even if outdated, or by personal images of politicians. Taking into account the results of the study, some modifications to the election procedure are proposed to bridge approaches of representative and direct democracy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKIT [u.a.] Karlsruheen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper series in economics 8en_US
dc.subject.jelD71en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordrepresentative democracyen_US
dc.subject.keyworddirect democracyen_US
dc.subject.keywordelectionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordcoalitionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordtheory of votingen_US
dc.subject.keywordmathematical theory of democracyen_US
dc.subject.keywordindices of popularity and universalityen_US
dc.subject.stwDemokratieen_US
dc.subject.stwWahlverhaltenen_US
dc.subject.stwPolitische Parteien_US
dc.subject.stwRegierungskoalitionen_US
dc.subject.stwMeinungen_US
dc.subject.stwDemokratieen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleDecision making in politics and economics: 4. Bundestag elections 2009 and direct democracyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn638539935en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:kitwps:8-
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series in Economics, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
638539935.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.