EconStor >
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Mailand >
FEEM Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei  >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/40685
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKruseman, Gideonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPellegrini, Lorenzoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-11en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-29T08:56:52Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-29T08:56:52Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/40685-
dc.description.abstractDeforestation in the North western part of Pakistan is a long standing problem. The Forestry Department, as formal managers of the forest resources, has been undergoing a long reform process aimed at improving its performance. This reform process has not resulted in less deforestation. From the policy perspective this has been leading to stated intentions to further reform the Forestry Department, the question is whether organizational reform is the answer. We think there are more limiting bottlenecks to sustainable forest management in Pakistan. De facto property rights are not as simple as denoted by statutory law. In this article we explore the mechanisms behind the deforestation and try to uncover mechanisms to reverse the process. Although our conclusions are not very optimistic, we provide a framework for determining the bottlenecks in the management of common resources from the perspective of institutions. We show that in circumstances where institutional change is necessary we are faced with a trade-off between the transaction costs related to the enforcement of 'improved' institutional arrangements and the transaction costs improving enforceable institutional arrangements. Incurring these transaction costs only makes sense if the benefits from improved institutional arrangements outweigh them and the transition costs. When we relate this dilemma to the management regime of the forest in North west Pakistan, we identify at the one end of the spectrum the ideal forest management system; at the other end we see the spontaneous evolution of self organization. The current situation is an intermediate form with an incoherent set of external interventions and strategic reactions by different agents in the local communities. The emergent system of management is the one producing the present dismal outcome.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Milanoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNota di lavoro // Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: NRM, Natural resources management 2008,42en_US
dc.subject.jelQ23en_US
dc.subject.jelQ58en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordNew institutional Economicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordCorruptionen_US
dc.subject.keywordForestryen_US
dc.subject.keywordSwaten_US
dc.subject.stwAbholzungen_US
dc.subject.stwForstpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwKorruptionen_US
dc.subject.stwNeue Institutionenökonomiken_US
dc.subject.stwSwaten_US
dc.subject.stwPakistanen_US
dc.titleInstitutions and forest management: A case study from Swat, Pakistanen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn568806077en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:FEEM Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
568806077.pdf259.87 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.