|
EconStor >
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Mailand >
FEEM Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/40643
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Billand, Pascal | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Frachisse, David | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Massard, Nadine | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2008-06-11 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-09-29T08:55:56Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2010-09-29T08:55:56Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2008 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/40643 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | In this paper, we compare two different representations of Framework Programs as affiliation network: 'One-mode networks' and 'Two-mode networks'. The aim of this article is to show that the choice of the representation has an impact on the analysis of the networks and on the results of the analysis. In order to support our proposals, we present two forms of representation and different indicators used in the analysis. We study the network of the 6th Framework Program using the two forms of representation. In particular, we show that the identification of the central nodes is sensitive to the chosen representation. Furthermore, the nodes forming the core of the network vary according to the representation. These differences of results are important as they can influence innovation policies. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Nota di lavoro // Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: CTN, Coalition theory network 2008,32 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | 031 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | 038 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | L14 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Affiliation Network | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Innovation Policies | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Centrality | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Forschung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Forschungskooperation | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Netzwerk | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Kern-Peripherie-Beziehung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Europäische Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | EU-Staaten | | en_US |
| dc.title | | The sixth framework program as an affiliation network: Representation and analysis | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 568796705 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | FEEM Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|