Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/40169 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Kiel Working Paper No. 1647
Publisher: 
Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel
Abstract: 
The previous literature provides a highly ambiguous picture on the impact of trade and investment agreements on FDI. Most empirical studies ignore the actual content of BITs and RTAs, treating them as 'black boxes', despite the diversity of investment provisions constituting the essence of these agreements. We overcome this serious limitation by analyzing the impact of modalities on the admission of FDI and dispute settlement mechanisms in both RTAs and BITs on bilateral FDI flows between 1978 and 2004. We find that FDI reacts positively to RTAs only if they offer liberal admission rules. Dispute settlement provisions play a minor role. While RTAs without strong investment provisions may even discourage FDI, the reactions to BITs are less discriminate with foreign investors responding favourably to the mere existence of BITs.
Subjects: 
foreign direct investment
bilateral investment treaties
regional trade agreements
admission rules
investor-state dispute settlement
JEL: 
F21
F23
K33
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.