EconStor >
Verein für Socialpolitik >
Ausschuss für Entwicklungsländer, Verein für Socialpolitik >
Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, 2009 (Frankfurt a.M.) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39956
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVollmer, Sebastianen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNowak-Lehmann D., Felicitasen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlann, Nilsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-13T15:02:06Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-13T15:02:06Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/39956-
dc.description.abstractSince early 2008 interim trade agreements between the EU and six regions of ACP countries (respectively sub-groups within the region) are in force. These agreements could be stepping stones towards full Economic Partnership Agreements between the EU and all ACP countries. We estimate the welfare effects of the interim agreements for nine African countries: Botswana, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Namibia, Tanzania, and Uganda. Our analysis is based on highly disaggregated data for trade and tariffs (HS six digit level) and follows a simple analytical model by Milner et al. (2006) to quantify the welfare effects of trade liberalization. We extend the literature in two principal ways: First, we estimate elasticities of import demand for the nine African countries importing from the EU and Sub-Saharan Africa respectively. Second, we apply the actual tariff reduction rates recently negotiated between the EU and the African countries to estimate the agreement's welfare effects of trade liberalization for the African countries. Results indicate that Botswana, Cameroon, Mozambique, and Namibia will significantly profit from the interim agreements, while the trade effects for Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda are close to zero. However, Tanzania and Uganda also have the potential to experience positive welfare effects, but predicted results of the liberalization based on the interim agreement's reduction rates fall short of the potential of a full liberalization.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherVerein für Socialpolitik, Ausschuss für Entwicklungsländer Göttingenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Frankfurt a.M. 2009 39en_US
dc.subject.jelF10en_US
dc.subject.jelF16en_US
dc.subject.jelO24en_US
dc.subject.jelO11en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordEconomic Partnership Agreementsen_US
dc.subject.keywordAfricaen_US
dc.subject.keywordtrade liberalizationen_US
dc.subject.keywordtariff reductionen_US
dc.subject.keywordwelfare analysisen_US
dc.subject.keywordACP countriesen_US
dc.titleEU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements - Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn654190089-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:gdec09:39-
Appears in Collections:Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, 2009 (Frankfurt a.M.)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
39_vollmer.pdf196.12 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.