Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39790
Authors: 
Berger, Allen N.
Bouwman, Christa H. S.
Kick, Thomas
Schaeck, Klaus
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies 2010,05
Abstract: 
Liquidity creation is one of banks' raisons d'être. But what happens to liquidity creation and risk taking when a bank is identified as distressed by regulatory bodies and subjected to regulatory interventions and/or receives capital injections? What are the long-run effects of such interventions? To address these questions, we exploit a unique dataset of German universal banks for the period 1999 - 2008. Our main findings are as follows. First, regulatory interventions and capital injections are followed by lower levels of liquidity creation. The probability of a decline in liquidity creation increases to up to around 50 percent when such actions are taken. Second, bank risk taking decreases in the aftermath of regulatory interventions and capital injections. Third, while banks' liquidity creation market shares decline over the five years following such disciplinary measures, they also reduce their risk exposure over this period to become safer banks.
Subjects: 
Liquidity creation
bank distress
regulatory interventions
capital injections
JEL: 
G21
G28
ISBN: 
978-3-86558-637-7
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
569.69 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.