|
EconStor >
Universität Rostock >
Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Rostock >
Thünen Series of Applied Economic Theory, Universität Rostock >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39782
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Rauscher, Michael | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Barbier, Edward B. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2009-10-16 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-09-08T07:48:12Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2010-09-08T07:48:12Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2007 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39782 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | The paper combines an economic-geography model of agglomeration and periphery with a model of species diversity and looks at optimal policies of biodiversity conservation. The subject of the paper is 'natural' biodiversity, which is inevitably impaired by anthropogenic impact. Thus, the economic and the ecological system compete for space and the question arises as to how this conflict should be resolved. The decisive parameters of the model are related to biological diversity (endemism vs. redundancy of species) and the patterns of economic geography (centrifugal and centripetal forces). As regards the choice of environmental-policy instruments, it is shown that Pigouvian taxes do not always establish the optimal allocation. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Univ., Wirtschafts- und Sozialwiss. Fak. Rostock | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Thünen-series of applied economic theory 79 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | Q56 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | Q57 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | Q58 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | R12 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | R14 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | R23 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | biodiversity | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | new economic geography | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | agglomeration | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | species redundancy vs. endemism | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | environmental regulation | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Biodiversität | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Neue ökonomische Geographie | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Regionale Konzentration | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Naturschutz | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Umweltpolitik | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Umweltö | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Biodiversity and geography | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 610622242 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | Thünen Series of Applied Economic Theory, Universität Rostock
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|