Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/39248
Authors: 
Wentzel, Bettina
Oelmann, Mark
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
IWP Discussion Paper 2002/2
Abstract: 
The purpose of the paper is to explain why and how American universities have taken the lead in continuing education compared to their European counterparts. In a first step we will discuss different notions of continuing education and develop an analytical framework to handle its various forms. In a second step, we will develop a theoretical typology in the form of a morphography in order to scrutinize the basic structures of a system of continuing higher education. Third, using our morphography, we will introduce some empirical insight from a case study that was pursued at the Pennsylvania State University in July and August 2001. We conclude with our assessments as to which elements from the American system of higher and continuing education may be transferable to the European tradition.
Subjects: 
Continuing Education
Higher Education
Morphography
JEL: 
I21
I29
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
125.97 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.