|
EconStor >
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn >
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38874
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Albanese, Giuseppe | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Sorge, Marco M. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-06-09 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-08-18T11:11:46Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2010-08-18T11:11:46Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2010 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38874 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | In this paper we investigate the role of judicial control of lobbying activities in an endogenous policy framework, focusing on two dimensions of quality of the judiciary, namely efficiency and integrity. We present a multi-layer lobbying model where a self-interested group is allowed to inuence a public decision maker - and possibly the judicial authority itself, which performs an anti-corruption task - with the payment of illegal contributions, and provide general conditions for the existence of a zero-contribution equilibrium. Furthermore, we study how sensitive the main findings are to different institutional arrangements as to judicial independence. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Max Planck Inst. for Research on Collective Goods Bonn | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010,23 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | D72 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | D73 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | D78 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | H11 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | H49 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | H77 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Illegal lobbying | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Endogenous policy making | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Judicial control | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Justiz | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Rechtsdurchsetzung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Interessenpolitik | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Korruption | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Public Choice | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Theorie | | en_US |
| dc.title | | The role of the judiciary in the public decision making process | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 627600794 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|