Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38870
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Christophen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-29en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-18T11:11:43Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-18T11:11:43Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/38870-
dc.description.abstractOver the last 25 years, more than a hundred dictator game experiments have been published. This meta study summarizes the evidence. Exploiting the fact that most experiments had to fix parameters they did not intend to test, the meta study explores a rich set of control variables for multivariate analysis. It shows that Tobit models (assuming that dictators would even want to take money) and hurdle models (assuming that the decision to give a positive amount is separate from the choice of amount, conditional on giving) outperform mere meta-regression and OLS.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aMax Planck Inst. for Research on Collective Goods |cBonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aPreprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods |x2010,07en_US
dc.subject.jelC24en_US
dc.subject.jelC91en_US
dc.subject.jelD03en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwSpieltheorieen_US
dc.subject.stwRationales Verhaltenen_US
dc.subject.stwTesten_US
dc.subject.stwMeta-Analyseen_US
dc.subject.stwTobit-Modellen_US
dc.titleDictator games: A meta studyen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn622756745en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
663.94 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.