EconStor >
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut (WSI), Hans-Böckler-Stiftung >
WSI-Diskussionspapiere, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38794
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTangian, Andraniken_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-23en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-16T12:06:10Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-16T12:06:10Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/38794-
dc.description.abstractThe paper develops a negotiation model for flexicurity-relevant collective bargaining. Flexicurity is a European labour market policy which should compensate the ongoing flexibilization of employment relations by advances in employment security and social security. Flexibility is promoted by employers, whereas trade unions are concerned with security. First, the opposite interests of negotiating sides are expressed by indicators which evaluate flexibility and security aspects of a collective labour agreement (CLA). A fair agreement should have 0-balance, by analogy with credit-debit 0-balance in finances. Since the flexibility and security indices are expressed in different scales ('in different currencies'), the substitution rate ('exchange rate') should be determined. In our case it is done by regression analysis of flexicurity-relevant CLAs from the past practice. The data are taken from the Dutch computer archive of about 5400 CLAs in years 1995 - 2007. For a given CLA, a positive deviation from the flexibility-security 0-balance means that flexibilization issues are well compensated by security measures (better than on the average). A negative deviation means that flexibility prevails over security, implying that trade unions are disadvantaged. The model outputs tables and graphics and can be regarded as a kind of interactive check-list. It shows shortages and advantages of a given collective agreement with several indices, and displays its relative position with regard to all reference CLAs considered, to those of the given year, to those within the branch, or within the branch in the given year. Finally, the total evaluation of the CLA is made in terms of so called flexicurity balance. This approach can be easily extended to issues beyond flexibility and security. Besides pragmatic goals, the study provides empirical evidence of increasing flexibility at the price of security. This is a serious warning against improper implementation of flexicurity and one-sided use of this policy in favor of employers. The computer tool developed is just aimed at enhancing the position of trade unions to the end of surmounting this negative trend.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWirtschafts- und Sozialwiss. Inst. Düsseldorfen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWSI-Diskussionspapiere 165en_US
dc.subject.jelC43-
dc.subject.jelC51-
dc.subject.jelC78-
dc.subject.jelH55-
dc.subject.jelJ5-
dc.subject.jelJ21-
dc.subject.jelJ88-
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordTrade unionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordcollective bargainingen_US
dc.subject.keywordcollective agreementsen_US
dc.subject.keywordlabour marketen_US
dc.subject.keywordflexicurityen_US
dc.subject.keywordcomposite indicatorsen_US
dc.subject.keyworddecision supporten_US
dc.subject.stwLohnverhandlungenen_US
dc.subject.stwTarifpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwManagement-Informationssystemen_US
dc.subject.stwFlexicurityen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsmarktflexibilisierungen_US
dc.subject.stwSoziale Sicherungen_US
dc.subject.stwEU-Politiken_US
dc.subject.stwNiederlandeen_US
dc.titleTowards computer-aided collective bargaining: Enhancing the trade unions position under flexicurityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn609336657en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:wsidps:165-
Appears in Collections:WSI-Diskussionspapiere, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
609336657.pdf759.49 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.