EconStor >
Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (HSU), Hamburg >
Fächergruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (HSU) >
Diskussionspapiere, Fächergruppe VWL, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/38728
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerlemann, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Klaus W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-22en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-13T12:18:51Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-13T12:18:51Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:gbv:705-opus-20927en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/38728-
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the role of unionized members of the parliament. Referring to the famous study by Freeman and Medoff (1984) and considering the more recent literature we first review unions' political power at the example of the US. We conclude that trade unions have not been very successful in increasing its monopoly power during the last decades. We then study in how far similar results can be found in Europe, where the degree of unionization is considerably higher than in the US. A recent study by Hönigsberger (2008) for Germany basically concludes union members to overwhelmingly stick to their duties as representatives and thus cannot be seen as the parliamentary arm of the trade unions. However, we present contradicting empirical results, based on a newly constructed dataset for Germany. In a VAR analysis we find that the degree of unionization of parliamentary members has a negative impact on economic growth and at the same time increases inflation while detrended unemployment remains unaffected. The effects are stable even after controlling for partisan politics. Thus, at least in Germany trade unions do not seem to be as weak as they tend to claim.en_US
dc.language.isogeren_US
dc.publisherHelmut-Schmidt-Univ. Hamburgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiskussionspapierreihe // Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Fächergruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre 97en_US
dc.subject.jelJ51en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordtrade unionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordunemploymenten_US
dc.subject.keywordgrowthen_US
dc.subject.keywordinflationen_US
dc.subject.stwAbgeordneteen_US
dc.subject.stwGewerkschaftlicher Organisationsgraden_US
dc.subject.stwInteressenpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwWirkungsanalyseen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitslosigkeiten_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftswachstumen_US
dc.subject.stwInflationen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleGewerkschaften im Bundestag: Gemeinwohlorientiert oder Lobbyisten?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn608266000en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Diskussionspapiere, Fächergruppe VWL, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
608266000.pdf288.11 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.