EconStor >
Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel >
Kieler Arbeitspapiere, IfW >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/3755
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThiele, Raineren_US
dc.contributor.authorNunnenkamp, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorDreher, Axelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T14:15:59Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T14:15:59Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/3755-
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the aid portfolio of various bilateral and multilateral donors, testing whether they have prioritised aid in line with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In doing so, we combine sectorally disaggregated aid data with indicators reflecting the situation of recipient countries regarding the MDGs. Our results show that donors differ not only in terms of their overall generosity and the general poverty orientation of aid, but also in the extent to which their sectoral aid allocation is conducive to achieving more specific MDGs such as all children completing a full course of primary schooling, reducing child and maternal mortality as well as reversing the spread of HIV/AIDS. Overall, while some MDGs, e.g., the fight against HIV/AIDS, have shaped the allocation of aid, the sector-specific results reveal that with respect to other MDGs, most notably primary education, there is a considerable gap between donor rhetoric and actual aid allocation. These results invite the conclusion that the current focus on substantially increasing aid in order to turn the tide in trying to achieve the MDGs misses one important point: Unless the targeting of aid is improved, higher aid will not have the desired effects. Our results suggest that at least part of the blame for missing the MDGs falls on insufficient targeting of aid.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kielen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKieler Arbeitspapiere 1266en_US
dc.subject.jelF35en_US
dc.subject.jelO11en_US
dc.subject.ddc330-
dc.subject.keywordAid Allocationen_US
dc.subject.keywordMDGs-
dc.subject.keywordDevelopment Aid-
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungshilfeen_US
dc.subject.stwArmutspolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftspolitische Wirkungsanalyseen_US
dc.subject.stwWelten_US
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungsländeren_US
dc.titleSectoral aid priorities: Are donors really doing their best to achieve the millennium development goals?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn50594488Xen_US
dc.identifier.ppn50594488Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des IfW
Kieler Arbeitspapiere, IfW

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
kap1266.pdf897.75 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.