Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/37463 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEichenberger, Reineren
dc.contributor.authorStadelmann, Daviden
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-11T09:04:37Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-11T09:04:37Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/37463-
dc.description.abstractPublic debts capitalize into property prices. This so far neglected fact has important consequences for the tax vs. debt choice. Property owners suffer more from the debt burden and, thus, have a stronger preference for tax financing of government spending than tenants. As a consequence of the resulting democratic struggle between property owners and tenants, the property ownership rate in a jurisdiction negatively affects public debts. We provide empirical support for this hypothesis by analyzing a cross-section of the 171 communities in the Swiss Canton of Zurich in the year 2000.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aVerein für Socialpolitik |cFrankfurt a. M.en
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aBeiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2010: Ökonomie der Familie - Session: Local Public Debt |xD17-V3en
dc.subject.jelH74en
dc.subject.jelR51en
dc.subject.jelH00en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordPublic Debtsen
dc.subject.keywordHomeownershipen
dc.subject.keywordTaxesen
dc.subject.keywordRicardian Equivalenceen
dc.titleConsequences of Debt Capitalization: Property Ownership and Debt/Tax Choice-
dc.typeConference Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn654930457en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.