EconStor >
Verein für Socialpolitik >
Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2010: Ökonomie der Familie >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/37307
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZimmer, Markusen_US
dc.contributor.authorGronwald, Marcen_US
dc.contributor.authorJus, Darkoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-11T09:04:32Z-
dc.date.available2010-08-11T09:04:32Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/37307-
dc.description.abstractA number of recent papers extend traditional Hotelling frameworks by the topical issue of climate change. They study the effects of different environmental taxes on the resource extraction paths and derive important and far-reaching policy implications. In particular the most recent strain of literature devoted to the so called Green Paradox shows how over various economic channels a steady increase in environmental taxation rather accelerates resource extraction instead of resulting in the desired slow down. The cause of this paradox lies in the inability to tax the supply side of the resource and thus limits the policy instruments to the demand. Thus, e.g. an oil-sheikh has an interest to sell his oil while it is still relatively low taxed and he can still generate higher profits. This effect could be seen as a kind of intertemporal carbon leakage transferring future extraction to the present. The Green Paradox literature generally concludes that a binding global certifcate system covering all CO2 sources is the only solution and that attempts of implementing greener policies in the transition process are counterproductive. However, the underlying implicit assumption is that extraction capacities are suffcient and that capacity adjustments are costless. Our paper accounts for an endogenous capacity building decision under convex adjustment costs by extending the original Hotelling type formulation of the Green Paradox. The analysis shows that for typical assumptions about the cost structure greener policies stay a useable instrument in the transition process. We are able to define the necessary conditions for the policy measures to be effective and show that the evaluation of the Green Paradox differs for pre and post oil-peak regimes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherVerein für Socialpolitik Frankfurt a. M.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBeiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2010: Ökonomie der Familie - Session: Optimal Resource Extraction A15-V4en_US
dc.subject.jelQ50en_US
dc.subject.jelC61en_US
dc.subject.jelQ31en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordGlobal warmingen_US
dc.subject.keywordcarbon taxationen_US
dc.subject.keywordoptimal taxationen_US
dc.titleThe Green Paradox and the Choice of Capacityen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn654936366-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2010: Ökonomie der Familie

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
VfS_2010_pid_478.pdf341.35 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.