|
EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/36879
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Manzini, Paola | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Mariotti, Marco | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-06-25 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-07-23T09:34:26Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2010-07-23T09:34:26Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2010 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/36879 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | We study a psychologically based foundation for choice errors. The decision maker applies a preference ranking after forming a 'consideration set' prior to choosing an alternative. Membership of the consideration set is determined both by the alternative specific salience and by the rationality of the agent (his general propensity to consider all alternatives). The model turns out to include a logit formulation as a special case. In general, it has a rich set of implications both for exogenous parameters and for a situation in which alternatives can affect their own salience (salience games). Such implications are relevant to assess the link between 'revealed' preferences and 'true' preferences: for example, less rational agents may paradoxically express their preference through choice more truthfully than more rational agents. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | IZA Bonn | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Discussion paper series // Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 5006 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | D0 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Discrete choice | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | random utility | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | logit model | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | consideration sets | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | bounded rationality | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Diskrete Entscheidung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Persönlichkeitspsychologie | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Beschränkte Rationalität | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Präferenztheorie | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Offenbarte Präferenzen | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Logit-Modell | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Theorie | | en_US |
| dc.title | | A salience theory of choice errors | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 630059829 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|