Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/36879
Authors: 
Manzini, Paola
Mariotti, Marco
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion paper series // Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 5006
Abstract: 
We study a psychologically based foundation for choice errors. The decision maker applies a preference ranking after forming a 'consideration set' prior to choosing an alternative. Membership of the consideration set is determined both by the alternative specific salience and by the rationality of the agent (his general propensity to consider all alternatives). The model turns out to include a logit formulation as a special case. In general, it has a rich set of implications both for exogenous parameters and for a situation in which alternatives can affect their own salience (salience games). Such implications are relevant to assess the link between 'revealed' preferences and 'true' preferences: for example, less rational agents may paradoxically express their preference through choice more truthfully than more rational agents.
Subjects: 
Discrete choice
random utility
logit model
consideration sets
bounded rationality
JEL: 
D0
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
292.69 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.