EconStor >
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main >
Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Universität Frankfurt a. M. >
Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting, Universität Frankfurt a. M. >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/36644
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Jenniferen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-11-31en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-15T12:57:32Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-15T12:57:32Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/36644-
dc.description.abstractPerformance measures shall enhance the performance of companies by directing the attention of decision makers towards the achievement of organizational goals. Therefore, goal congruence is regarded in literature as a major factor in the quality of such measures. As reality is affected by many variables, in practice one has tried to achieve a high degree of goal congruence by incorporating an increasing number of these variables into performance measures. However, a goal congruent measure does not lead automatically to superior decisions, because decision makers' restricted cognitive abilities can counteract the intended effects. This paper addresses the interplay between goal congruence and complexity of performance measures considering cognitively-restricted decision makers. Two types of decision quality are derived which allow a differentiated view on the influence of this interplay on decision quality and learning. The simulation experiments based on this differentiation provide results which allow a critical reflection on costs and benefits of goal congruence and the assumptions regarding the goal congruence of incentive systems.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv., Fachbereich Wirtschaftswiss. Frankfurt am Mainen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper series // Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften Finance & accounting 188en_US
dc.subject.jelM10en_US
dc.subject.jelM41en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordPerformance measurementen_US
dc.subject.keywordgoal congruenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordexperience-based learningen_US
dc.subject.keywordsimulation-based researchen_US
dc.subject.stwPerformance Measurementen_US
dc.subject.stwBetriebswirtschaftliches Zielen_US
dc.subject.stwLernprozessen_US
dc.titleDo we measure what we get?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn584110367en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting, Universität Frankfurt a. M.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
584110367.pdf455.98 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.