|
EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/35559
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Noonan, Douglas S. | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Krupka, Douglas J. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2008-11-04 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-07-07T11:53:18Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2010-07-07T11:53:18Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2008 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pi | | urn:nbn:de:101:1-20081126364 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/35559 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | There is much interest among cultural economists in assessing the effects of heritage preservation policies. There has been less interest in modeling the policy choices made in historic and cultural landmark preservation. This paper builds an economic model of a landmark designation that highlights the tensions between the interests of owners of cultural amenities and the interests of the neighboring community. We perform empirical tests by estimating a discrete choice model for landmark preservation using data from Chicago, combining the Chicago Historical Resources Survey of over 17,000 historic structures with property sales, Census, and other geographic data. The data allow us to explain why some properties were designated landmarks (or landmark districts) and others were not. The results identify the influence of property characteristics, local socio-economic factors, and measures of historic and cultural quality. The results emphasize the political economy of implementing preservation policies. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | IZA Bonn | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | IZA discussion papers 3777 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | Z1 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Heritage preservation policy | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | landmark designation | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Kulturpolitik | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Landschaftspflege | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Public Choice | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | USA | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Determinants of historic and cultural landmark designation: why we preserve what we preserve | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 584275854 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)
|
| Files in This Item:
| |
|
| No. of Downloads:
| |
| last Month |
last 3 Month |
total |
|
|
|
|
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|