EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/35010
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoretti, Enricoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-10-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-07T11:31:26Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-07T11:31:26Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:101:1-20081014419en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/35010-
dc.description.abstractA large literature has documented a significant increase in the return to college over the past 30 years. This increase is typically measured using nominal wages. I show that from 1980 to 2000, college graduates have increasingly concentrated in metropolitan areas that are characterized by a high cost of housing. This implies that college graduates are increasingly exposed to a high cost of living and that the relative increase in their real wage may be smaller than the relative increase in their nominal wage. To measure the college premium in real terms, I deflate nominal wages using a new CPI that allows for changes in the cost of housing to vary across metropolitan areas and education groups. I find that half of the documented increase in the return to college between 1980 and 2000 disappears when I use real wages. This finding does not appear to be driven by differences in housing quality and is robust to a number of alternative specifications. The implications of this finding for changes in well-being inequality depend on why college graduates sort into expensive cities. Using a simple general equilibrium model, I consider two alternative explanations. First, it is possible that the relative supply of college graduates increases in expensive cities because college graduates are increasingly attracted by amenities located in those cities. In this case, higher cost of housing reflects consumption of desirable local amenities, and there may still be a significant increase in well-being inequality even if the increase in real wage inequality is limited. Alternatively, it is possible that the relative demand of college graduates increases in expensive cities due to shifts in the relative productivity of skilled labor. In this case, the relative increase in skilled workers' standard of living is offset by higher cost of living. The empirical evidence indicates that relative demand shifts are more important than relative supply shifts, suggesting that the increase in well-being inequality between 1980 and 2000 is smaller than the increase in nominal wage inequality.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIZA Bonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIZA discussion papers 3706en_US
dc.subject.jelJ01en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordCost of livingen_US
dc.subject.keywordgeneral equilibriumen_US
dc.subject.keywordreturn to collegeen_US
dc.subject.stwBildungsertragen_US
dc.subject.stwAkademische Berufeen_US
dc.subject.stwEinkommenen_US
dc.subject.stwWohnstandorten_US
dc.subject.stwLebenshaltungskostenen_US
dc.subject.stwLebensstandarden_US
dc.subject.stwEinkommensverteilungen_US
dc.subject.stwUSAen_US
dc.titleReal wage inequalityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn581181905en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
581181905.pdf435.3 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.