|
EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/34790
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Feri, Francesco | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Irlenbusch, Bernd | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Sutter, Matthias | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2008-10-14 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2010-07-07T11:29:22Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2010-07-07T11:29:22Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2008 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pi | | urn:nbn:de:101:1-2008101608 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/34790 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | The need for efficient coordination is ubiquitous in organizations and industries. The literature on the determinants of efficient coordination has focused on individual decision-making so far. In reality, however, teams often have to coordinate with other teams. We present an experiment with 825 participants, using six different coordination games, where either individuals or teams interact with each other. We find that teams coordinate much more efficiently than individuals. This finding adds one important cornerstone to the recent literature on the conditions for successful coordination. We explain the differences between individuals and teams using the experience weighted attraction learning model. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | IZA Bonn | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | IZA discussion papers 3741 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | C71 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Coordination games | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | individual decision-making | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | team decision-making | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | experience-weighted attraction learning | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | experiment | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Gruppenentscheidung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Kooperatives Spiel | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Lernprozess | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Wirtschaftliche Effizienz | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Test | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Efficiency gains from team-based coordination: large-scale experimental evidence | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 581789571 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|