Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/33878 
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 2241
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
This paper looks at the wage effects of perceived and objective insecurity in Germany and the UK using the GSOEP and BHPS panels. The distinction between perceived worry about job loss and economic indicators such as regional unemployment rates and the share of temporary contracts is established. The bargaining hypothesis that job security and wages are complements because of union bargaining power and preference is derived from a variant of the right to manage model. This hypothesis is contrasted with Rosen's theory of equalising differences where security and wages are substitutes. The empirical literature surveyed finds evidence for both sides. When addressing a number of econometric issues in earlier studies of the bargaining hypothesis this paper finds strong evidence in favour of the former. Accounting for simultaneous determination of job insecurity and wages significantly negative level effects are found for Germany with some evidence for those in the UK. There is also some evidence for growth rate effects (especially for perceived insecurity), but it does not appear robust. Job insecurity, both perceived and objective is found to have influenced wage development in both countries.
Subjects: 
job security , wages , Germany
UK
JEL: 
J28
J31
J63
J81
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
386.81 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.