EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33625
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLalive, Rafaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorZweimüller, Josefen_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-06-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-07T09:13:28Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-07T09:13:28Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/33625-
dc.description.abstractWe study the causal effects of changes in parental leave provisions on fertility and return-to-work behavior. We exploit a policy change that took place in 1990 in Austria which extended the maximum duration of parental leave from the child's first to the child's second birthday. As parental leave benefits can be automatically renewed when a new mother is still on leave from a previous child, this created a strong incentive to bunch the time off work in case of multiple planned children and/or to increase fertility. We study the quantitative effect of this incentive using an empirical strategy which resembles a true experimental set-up very closely. In particular, assignment to treatment is random and treated and controls face (almost) identical environmental conditions. We find that treated mothers have a 4.9 percentage points (or 15 percent) higher probability to get an additional child within the following three years; and a 3.9 percentage points higher probability in the following ten years. This suggests that not only the timing but also the number of children were affected by the policy change. We also find that parental leave rules have a strong effect on mothers' return-to-work behavior. Per additional months of maximum parental leave duration, mothers' time off work is reduced by 0.4 to 0.5 months. The effects of a subsequent policy change in 1996 when maximum parental leave duration was reduced from the child's second birthday to the date when the child became 18 months old brought about no change in fertility behavior, but a labor supply effect that is comparable in magnitude to the one generated by the 1990 policy change. This can be rationalized by the incentives created through automatic benefit renewal.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIZA Bonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIZA Discussion Papers 1613en_US
dc.subject.jelJ13en_US
dc.subject.jelJ18en_US
dc.subject.jelJ22en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordparental leaveen_US
dc.subject.keywordpro-natalist policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordfamily and work obligationsen_US
dc.subject.keywordreturn to worken_US
dc.subject.keywordlabor supplyen_US
dc.subject.stwErziehungsurlauben_US
dc.subject.stwFruchtbarkeiten_US
dc.subject.stwFrauenerwerbstätigkeiten_US
dc.subject.stwFamilienpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwÖsterreichen_US
dc.titleDoes parental leave affect fertility and return-to-work? Evidence from a true natural experimenten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn488842476en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
488842476.pdf248.87 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.