Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33549
Authors: 
Vijverberg, Wim P. M.
Hartog, Joop
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 1809
Abstract: 
We analyse the information in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles to characterize the structure of labour demand. Two dimensions, an intellectual factor and a dexterity factor capture most variation in job requirements. Job complexity in relation to Things correlates highly with the dexterity factor. Complexity in relation to Data is intricately interwoven with most other dimensions of jobs. Remarkably, while complexity in relation to Data and to Things associates with extensive training, this does not hold for complexity in relation to People. There is no dichotomy between mathematical and verbal required skills. Poor working conditions are not the exclusive prerogative for workers in low level jobs. This independence provides a good setting for testing the theory of compensating wage differentials and indeed we find a good deal of support.
Subjects: 
labor demand structure
job requirements
compensating differentials
JEL: 
J21
J23
J31
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
444.11 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.