Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/33445 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 1784
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Income cap or threshold systems rely on incentives that encourage physicians to limit medical expenditures, but little is known about how physicians respond to these incentives. Conceptually, the threshold system is to physicians what an income tax system is to taxpayers. We exploit this similarity to analyze the impact of a reform that changed what is included in the 'taxable' billings of physicians in Ontario, Canada. We find that for services that the reform turned from exempted to non-exempted, the reform had a strong, negative impact for physicians with billings above the minimum threshold and a negligible impact for physicians below the threshold. The reform had no impact on services that were non-exempted both before and after the reform. This response of physicians to the threshold reform resembles the expected response of taxpayers to a similar change in the income tax system.
Subjects: 
physicians' behavior
income thresholds
non-convex budget sets
JEL: 
I10
I18
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
392.69 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.