EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33299
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaint-Paul, Gillesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-06-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-07T09:09:57Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-07T09:09:57Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/33299-
dc.description.abstractTrade liberalization is often met with sharp opposition. Recent examples include the so-called Bolkestein directive, which allows service providers from a given EU member to temporarily work in another member country. One way to view such a reform is that it simply widens the range of goods that are tradeable. This kind of reform is analyzed in a two-country Dornbusch-Fischer-Samuelson style model, where labor cannot relocate to another sector upon a non expected increase in the range of goods that can be traded. The effect of liberalization on the terms of trade tends to favor the poorer country (the East), if (as assumed) the most sophisticated goods are tradeable before reform. Second, under ex-post liberalization, there exists a class of workers in the West who are harmed because they face competition from Eastern workers and cannot relocate to other activities. But if the East's economy is relatively small, their wage losses are not very large. Things are different, however, if there exist asymmetries in labor market institutions, such that upon reform, labor can relocate in the East but not in the West. Some workers in the West can then experience very large wage losses. Thus, rigid labor markets in the West magnify opposition to reform there.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIZA Bonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIZA Discussion Papers 1618en_US
dc.subject.jelF16en_US
dc.subject.jelF11en_US
dc.subject.jelF13en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordtrade liberalizationen_US
dc.subject.keywordEuropean integrationen_US
dc.subject.keywordBolkestein directiveen_US
dc.subject.keywordlabor mobilityen_US
dc.subject.keywordlabor market institutionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordcomparative advantageen_US
dc.subject.keywordterms of tradeen_US
dc.subject.stwAußenhandelsliberalisierungen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsmarktsegmentierungen_US
dc.subject.stwInternationale Arbeitsmobilitäten_US
dc.subject.stwInternationaler Dienstleistungsverkehren_US
dc.subject.stwEuropäische Integrationen_US
dc.subject.stwEU-Staatenen_US
dc.titleMaking sense of Bolkestein-bashing: trade liberalization under segmented labor marketsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn488862701en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
488862701.pdf260.89 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.