Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33292
Authors: 
Gupta, Nabanita Datta
Smith, Nina
Verner, Mette
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 2014
Abstract: 
The Nordic countries have remarkably high participation rates of mothers and a moderate decrease of fertility rates compared to other western countries. This has been attributed to the fact that the welfare state model and, especially, the family friendly policies chosen in the Nordic countries are unique. The availability of generous parental leave schemes including high compensation rates makes it possible for mothers to take a considerable time out of work in connection with childbirths and to return to their previous jobs afterwards, thanks to the high provision of public daycare. In this paper we evaluate family-friendly policies in the 'Nordic model' with respect to the two modes of child care i.e. either parental care facilitated by maternal and parental leave schemes or non-parental publicly provided care. Our questions for discussion are: Is there a 'Nordic model', and is it worth the cost if effects on child development and welfare are included? Is there a trade-off between family-friendly policies and family welfare, and are there serious negative boomerang effects of family-friendly policies on women's position in the labor market? Is the 'Nordic model' a model to aspire to?
Subjects: 
family friendly policies
labour supply
gender wage gap
fertility
public expenditures
JEL: 
J1
J2
D1
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
349.83 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.