EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/33179
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPostel-Vinay, Fabienen_US
dc.contributor.authorTuron, Hélèneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-05en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-07T09:07:45Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-07T09:07:45Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/33179-
dc.description.abstractThe existing literature on inequality between private and public sectors focuses on cross-section differences in earnings levels. A more general way of looking at inequality between sectors is to recognize that forward-looking agents will care about income and job mobility too. We show that these are substantially different between the two sectors. Using data from the BHPS, we estimate a model of income and employment dynamics over seven years. We allow for unobserved heterogeneity in the propensity to be unemployed or employed in either job sector and in terms of the income process. We then combine the results into lifetime values of jobs in either sector and carry out a cross-section comparative analysis of these values. We have four main findings. First focusing on cross-sector differences in terms of the income process only, we detect a positive average public premium both in income flows and in the present discounted sum of future income flows. Second, most of the observed relative income compression in the public sector is due to a lower variance of the transitory component of income. Third, when taking job mobility into account, the lifetime public premium is essentially zero for workers that we categorize as high-employability individuals, suggesting that the UK labor market is sufficiently mobile to ensure a rapid allocation of workers into their natural sector. Fourth, we find some evidence of job queuing for public sector jobs among low-employability workers.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIZA Bonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIZA Discussion Papers 1637en_US
dc.subject.jelJ45en_US
dc.subject.jelJ31en_US
dc.subject.jelJ62en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordincome dynamicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordjob mobilityen_US
dc.subject.keywordpublic-private inequalityen_US
dc.subject.keywordselection effectsen_US
dc.subject.stwVergütungssystemen_US
dc.subject.stwBesoldungen_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentlicher Diensten_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentlicher Sektoren_US
dc.subject.stwVergleichen_US
dc.subject.stwPrivatwirtschaften_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwGroßbritannienen_US
dc.titleThe public pay gap in Britain: small differences that (don't?) matteren_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn493411399en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
493411399.pdf521.39 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.