EconStor >
Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Jena >
Jena Economic Research Papers, MPI für Ökonomik >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32627
  
Title:On the informational loss inherent in approximation procedures: Welfare implications and impulse responses PDF Logo
Authors:Sienknecht, Sebastian
Issue Date:2010
Series/Report no.:Jena economic research papers 2010,005
Abstract:This paper shows the inappropriatedness of approximation procedures for welfare rankings across suboptimal policy strategies. On the grounds of a simple general equilibrium model, we find that even commonly accepted techniques are not suitable to achieve accurate welfare orderings. This result points to a non-universality of these methods since we unveil welfare reversals when we compare them with the implications of the corresponding Ramsey problem. We infer that the spurious outcomes originate from restricting the approximations to only first and second-order moments. The order of approximation needed to obtain accuracy obviously depends on the underlying type of general equilibrium model and on its parameter values. But this creates uncertainty about the correct degree of approximation adopted by researchers in order to obtain clear welfare insights. Therefore, we strongly recommend that normative analyses should rely exclusively on the exact optimality conditions delivered by the Ramsey problem. Nonetheless, we are able to propose approximation methods in order to characterize macroeconomic fluctuations triggered by small disturbances.
Subjects:Monetary Policy
Macroeconomic Policy Consistency
First-order approximation
Second-order approximation
Purely quadratic approach
JEL:C63
E52
E61
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Jena Economic Research Papers, MPI für Ökonomik

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
618600523.pdf660.8 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32627

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.