Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32569
Authors: 
Binder, Martin
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
Jena economic research papers 2009,099
Abstract: 
The concept of utility is often used in ambiguous ways in economics, from having substantive psychological connotations to being a formal placeholder representing a person's preferences. In the accounts of the early utilitarians, it was a multidimensional measure that has been condensed during the marginalist revolution into the unidimensional measure we know today. But can we compare different pleasures? This paper assesses the evidence from psychology and neurosciences on how to best conceive of utility. It turns out that empirical evidence does not favor a view of multidimensional utility. This does not eliminate the possibility to make a normative argument supporting a multidimensional notion of utility.
Subjects: 
utility
pleasures
neuroeconomics
multidimensionality of utility
JEL: 
D87
B41
B12
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
414.08 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.