Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/3244 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2004
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Economics Working Paper No. 2004-05
Verlag: 
Kiel University, Department of Economics, Kiel
Zusammenfassung: 
We investigate the predictability of both volatility and volume for a large sample of Japanese stocks. The particular emphasis of this paper is on assessing the performance of long memory time series models in comparison to their short-memory counterparts. Since long memory models should have a particular advantage over long forecasting horizons, we consider predictions of up to 100 days ahead. In most respects, the long memory models (ARFIMA, FIGARCH and the recently introduced multifractal models) dominate over GARCH and ARMA models. However, while FIGARCH and ARFIMA also have a number of cases with dramatic failures of their forecasts, the multifractal model does not suffer from this shortcoming and its performance practically always improves upon the na?ve forecast provided by historical volatility. As a somewhat surprising result, we also find that, for FIGARCH and ARFIMA models, pooled estimates (i.e. averages of parameter estimates from a sample of time series) give much better results than individually estimated models.
Schlagwörter: 
Long memory models
Volume
Volatility
Forecasting
JEL: 
G12
C53
C22
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
592.15 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.