EconStor >
Universität Duisburg-Essen (UDE) >
Institut für Betriebswirtschaft und Volkswirtschaft (IBES), Campus Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen >
IBES Diskussionsbeiträge, Universität Duisburg-Essen >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32122
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBudzinski, Oliveren_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-05en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-14T11:58:49Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-14T11:58:49Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/32122-
dc.description.abstractEconomics rightfully represents the major basis for competition policy. Next to generating knowledge about competition and its welfare effects, the currently popular 'more-economic approach' is charged with a number of additional hopes and expectations, leading to a reduction of the ambiguities of real-world competition policy. While this article highlights the benefits of economics-based competition policy, it takes a cautious stance towards excessive expectations in particular regarding the idea that a monocultural, 'unified' competition theory as an exact, objective, and unerring scientific approach to antitrust makes normative assessment and generalizations superfluous. In a combination of two lines of argumentation, diversity in competition economics is advocated. Firstly, competition economics is empirically characterized by a considerable pluralism of theories and policy paradigms. This includes deviating views on core concepts like the nature of competition, the meaning of efficiency, or the goals of antitrust. Secondly, it is demonstrated that diversity of theories represents no imperfection of the state of science. In contrast, it is theoretically beneficial for future scientific progress. Therefore, no ultimate competition theory can ever be expected. As a consequence, the 'more-economic approach' must be extended in order to embrace diversity. This does not decrease its meaning and importance but instead puts some of the related high hopes into perspective.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv. Duisburg-Essen, Standort Essen, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswiss. Essenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiskussionsbeiträge aus dem Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Essen 158en_US
dc.subject.jelL40en_US
dc.subject.jelB50en_US
dc.subject.jelL10en_US
dc.subject.jelK21en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordantitrusten_US
dc.subject.keywordmore-economic approachen_US
dc.subject.keywordcompetition policy paradigmsen_US
dc.subject.keywordindustrial economicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordmethodology of scienceen_US
dc.subject.stwWettbewerbstheorieen_US
dc.subject.stwDogmengeschichteen_US
dc.subject.stwWettbewerbspolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwTheorieen_US
dc.titleMonoculture versus diversity in competition economicsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn541747029en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:udewwd:158-
Appears in Collections:IBES Diskussionsbeiträge, Universität Duisburg-Essen

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
541747029.pdf323.77 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.