Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/32073
Authors: 
Rengifo, Erick W.
Trifan, Emanuela
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
Darmstadt discussion papers in economics 181
Abstract: 
This paper studies the attitude of non-professional investors towards financial losses and their decisions concerning wealth allocation among consumption, risky, and risk-free financial assets. We employ a two-dimensional utility setting in which both consumption and financial wealth fluctuations generate utility. The perception of financial wealth is modelled in an extended prospect-theory framework that accounts for both the distinction between gains and losses with respect to a subjective reference point and the impact of past performance on the current perception of the risky portfolio value. The decision problem is addressed in two distinct equilibrium settings in the aggregate market with a representative investor, namely with expected and non-expected utility. Empirical estimations performed on the basis of real market data and for various parameter configurations show that both settings similarly describe the attitude towards financial losses. Yet, the recommendations regarding wealth allocation are different. Maximizing expected utility results on average in low total-wealth percentages dedicated to consumption, but supports myopic loss aversion. Non-expected utility yields more reasonable assignments to consumption but also a high preference for risky assets. In this latter setting, myopic loss aversion holds solely when financial wealth fluctuations are viewed as the main utility source and in very soft form.
Subjects: 
prospect theory
Value-at-Risk
loss aversion
expected utility
non-expected utility
JEL: 
C32
C35
G10
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
395.93 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.