EconStor >
Freie Universit├Ąt Berlin >
Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence (JMC) - Ezoneplus Research Project, Freie Universit├Ąt Berlin >
Ezoneplus Working Papers, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, FU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/31951
  
Title:Partisan preferences and political institutions: explaining fiscal retrenchment in the European Union PDF Logo
Authors:Pamp, Oliver
Issue Date:2004
Series/Report no.:Ezoneplus working paper / Eastward Enlargement of the Eurozone 24
Abstract:Driven by the desire to fulfill the Maastricht fiscal criteria and pressed by mounting debt burdens that have accumulated over the past 30 years, a majority of EU-15 countries attempted to reduce their budget deficits during the 1990s. Yet, these nations have exhibited remarkable differences in their ability to pursue such retrenchment policies. This paper endeavours to illuminate the political and institutional factors that can help explain those differing degrees of fiscal retrenchment in European Union countries for the time period 1990-2001. Several variants of the partisan approach and the veto players framework are elucidated and applied to the question of budgetary consolidation. These elaborations yield four working hypotheses which are empirically tested using a time-series cross-section data set of 14 EU countries. The results lend support to the notion that a low number of insitutional veto players increases likelihood and extent of a budgetary retrenchment. Given these findings it is possible to draw some conclusions concerning the effectiveness and deficiencies of the Stability and Growth Pact.
Subjects:deficits
fiscal adjustment
partisan theory
veto players
time-series cross-secton models
JEL:C23
D72
D78
H62
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Ezoneplus Working Papers, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, FU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
480767866.pdf440.71 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/31951

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.