Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/31951 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
Ezoneplus Working Paper No. 24
Publisher: 
Free University Berlin, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, Berlin
Abstract: 
Driven by the desire to fulfill the Maastricht fiscal criteria and pressed by mounting debt burdens that have accumulated over the past 30 years, a majority of EU-15 countries attempted to reduce their budget deficits during the 1990s. Yet, these nations have exhibited remarkable differences in their ability to pursue such retrenchment policies. This paper endeavours to illuminate the political and institutional factors that can help explain those differing degrees of fiscal retrenchment in European Union countries for the time period 1990-2001. Several variants of the partisan approach and the veto players framework are elucidated and applied to the question of budgetary consolidation. These elaborations yield four working hypotheses which are empirically tested using a time-series cross-section data set of 14 EU countries. The results lend support to the notion that a low number of insitutional veto players increases likelihood and extent of a budgetary retrenchment. Given these findings it is possible to draw some conclusions concerning the effectiveness and deficiencies of the Stability and Growth Pact.
Subjects: 
deficits
fiscal adjustment
partisan theory
veto players
time-series cross-secton models
JEL: 
C23
D72
D78
H62
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
440.71 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.