EconStor >
Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg >
IAB-Discussion Paper, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/31890
  
Title:Bonus oder Bias?: Mechanismen geschlechtsspezifischer Entlohnung PDF Logo
Authors:Achatz, Juliane
Gartner, Hermann
Glück, Timea
Issue Date:2004
Series/Report no.:IAB discussion paper 2004,2
Abstract:To what extent is the gender wage gap of fulltime employees due to differences in productiv-ity- related characteristics, to discrimination of female employees, and how is the wage gap affected by firm specific features? To analyze these problems we use a linked employer-employee database for East and West Germany in 2000, made available by the Institute for Labour Market Research. In particular, we address the effect on wage levels of the sex com-position of occupations within firms (job cells). Our estimations rely on the decomposition of the wage differential proposed by Oaxaca and Blinder. We find that only one tenth of the gender gap in wages is explained by human capital differences between men and women. Re-garding the gender wage gap in Germany we conclude that discrimination in the allocation of men and women to different jobs is an important mechanism: With increasing proportions of women within job cells we observe decreasing wage levels for men and women but with higher rates of decline for women than for men. While the presence of worker's councils are shown to have a positive impact on wage levels, women are found to profit most from their presence within firms.
Subjects:Lohnunterschied - Determinanten
erwerbstätige Frauen
erwerbstätige Männer
Arbeitsproduktivität
Qualifikationsniveau
Betriebsrat
regionaler Vergleich
IAB-Linked-Employer-Employee-Datensatz
Ostdeutschland
Westdeutschland
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
JEL:J16
J31
J71
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:IAB-Discussion Paper, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
498003388.PDF232.66 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/31890

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.