Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/31296
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSigman, Hilaryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-23en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-14T11:02:15Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-14T11:02:15Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/31296-
dc.description.abstractSeveral U.S. states have attempted to use of legal liability imposed on greenhouse gas emitters as a public policy instrument for climate change. This brief comment considers the desirability of this approach, focusing on three possible roles for climate change liability: as a source of compensation, as a direct influence on greenhouse gas concentrations, and as a means to facilitate the adoption of ex ante public policies to control greenhouse gases. The strongest argument for liability may be that the threat of liability improves the chances that climate change policies will use more efficient, revenue-raising instruments.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aDep. of Economics, Rutgers, the State Univ. of New Jersey |cNew Brunswick, NJen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking papers // Department of Economics, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey |x2007,03en_US
dc.subject.jelK32en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordEnvironmental policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordlaw and economicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordrevenue recyclingen_US
dc.titleComment: legal liability as climate change policyen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn56826326Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
121.96 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.