Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/30330
Authors: 
Freeman, Mark C.
Year of Publication: 
2010
Citation: 
[Journal:] Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal [Volume:] 4 [Issue:] 2010-13 [Pages:] 1-21 [DOI/URN:] doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-13
Abstract: 
In this paper the author proves that the Expected Net Future Value (ENFV) criterion can lead a risk neutral social planner to reject projects that increase expected utility. By contrast, the Expected Net Present Value (ENPV) rule correctly identifies the economic value of the project. While the ENFV increases with uncertainty over future interest rates, the expected utility decreases because of the planner's desire to smooth consumption across time. This paper therefore shows that Weitzman (1998) is 'right' and that, within his economy, the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate.
Subjects: 
Discount rates
term structure
capital budgeting
interest rate uncertainty
environmental planning
JEL: 
D61
E43
G12
G31
Q51
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/de/deed.en
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
267.11 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.