EconStor >
Philipps-Universität Marburg >
Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Philipps-Universität Marburg >
Marburg Papers on Economics • Marburger Volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge, Universität Marburg >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/29829
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchüller, Alfreden_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-03-08en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-12T14:06:09Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-12T14:06:09Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/29829-
dc.description.abstractAt the turn of the 18th century Saint-Simon und his disciples, the Saint-Simonists, developed ideas about centrally planned and directed humane societies. These ideas are still influential and are proposed by some as guiding principles for the development of an institutional structure for a peaceful united Europe. According to the constructional interventionist ideas of the Saint-Simonists, classical liberal philosophies are the root cause of many problems in society. They therefore disapprove of liberal methods of integration which rely on competitive markets such as the one successfully employed by the German Customs Union in the 19th century. Emanating from France, the ideas of the Saint-Simonists on integration have been disseminated in a wide range of variants. However, experiences of the 20th century demonstrate the disastrous failure of the Saint-Simonist’ concepts of integration. So far no successful alternatives to liberal methods of integration which rely on competitive markets have been developed. Never-the-less, since the second world war, French interventions, in particular, have allowed Saint-Simonist’ ideals to influence the process of European Integration. While the dominance of liberal methods of integration via competitive markets was initially not challenged, the wide reaching possibilities for market interventions contained in the Maastricht treaties give a clear indication of the resurgence and spread of influence of Saint-Simonist ideals since the 1990s. Should these become dominant the multicultural community of the EU member countries will be at risk to suffer from increasing in political bureaucracy and the loss of competitive performance incentives and entrepreneurial freedom. The EU would thereby mutate to an institution described by Wilhelm Röpke as a “roof without a house”. This article calls for a systematic readjustment of EU policies in favour of liberal methods of integration, which should reaffirm non-discriminatory competition as the leading principle of EU integration. This aims at ensuring that the EU will remain an attractive community for its citizens in the long-term.en_US
dc.language.isogeren_US
dc.publisherUniv., Fachbereich Wirtschaftswiss. Marburgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMarburger volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge 2006,13en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwInterventionismusen_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftsintegrationen_US
dc.subject.stwWettbewerbspolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwEU-Staatenen_US
dc.subject.stwSowjetunionen_US
dc.titleSaint-Simonismus als Integrationsmethode: Idee und Wirklichkeit ; Lehren für die EUen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn525551522en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Marburg Papers on Economics • Marburger Volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge, Universität Marburg

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
525551522.PDF269.56 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.