EconStor >
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin >
DIW-Diskussionspapiere >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/29760
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZiebarth, Nicolas R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-04en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-04T13:06:12Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-04T13:06:12Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/29760-
dc.description.abstractThis study is the first to estimate the price elasticities of demand for both medical rehabilitation programs and treatment at health spas. In Germany, the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) covers both forms of therapy if administered in authorized medical facilities on referral from a physician. While health resort stays are prescribed to recover from general symptoms of poor health and are preventive in character, medical rehabilitation implies recovering from a specific illness or accident. From 1997 onwards, the German government more than doubled the copayments for both types of health care services from DM 12 (e6.14) to DM 25 (e12.78) per day for those insured under the SHI. Using longitudinal microdata from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), this exogenous price variation allows us to study the causal effects on demand, since we have a sound control group available. The data suggest that pull-forward effects in 1996 accounted for up to one-fifth of the subsequent decrease in demand. Taking this anticipation effect into account, we show that the reform induced a decrease in total demand of about 20 percent. We estimate the price elasticity for rehabilitation programs that aim at preventing work incapacity to be about -0.15, whereas the elasticity for rehabilitation programs for recovery from work accidents lies around -0.30. In contrast, the price elasticity for treatment at health spas is elastic and lies between -1 and -2.5.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDeutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Berlinen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion papers // German Institute for Economic Research 910en_US
dc.subject.jelH51en_US
dc.subject.jelI1en_US
dc.subject.jelI18en_US
dc.subject.jelJ22en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordConvalescent careen_US
dc.subject.keywordhealth spaen_US
dc.subject.keywordmedical rehabilitationen_US
dc.subject.keywordprice elasticitiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordSOEPen_US
dc.subject.stwRehabilitationen_US
dc.subject.stwPreiselastizitäten_US
dc.subject.stwGesundheitsreformen_US
dc.subject.stwWirkungsanalyseen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleDo I really need to go to rehab? I'd say no, no, no.: estimating price elasticities of convalescent care programsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn605961573en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des DIW
DIW-Diskussionspapiere

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
605961573.pdf690.06 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.