EconStor >
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg >
Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg >
Working Paper Series in Economics, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg  >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/28207
  
Title:A review of the German mandatory deposit for one-way drinks packaging and drinks packaging taxes in Europe PDF Logo
Authors:Groth, Markus
Issue Date:2008
Series/Report no.:University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics 87
Abstract:The mandatory deposit for one-way drinks packaging, embodied in the German Packaging Ordinance of 1991, entered into force in January 2003, after the condition for its implementation was given by the fall of the market share of reusable drinks packaging under 72% in 1997. In this context the author doubts that the German mandatory deposit is an effective instrument to stabilise the market share of ecologically advantageous drinks packaging. Rather it is to be expected that the environmental policy objectives can be accomplished more effectively by a reorientation of the specific environmental policy. Hence it needs to be considered that even eleven years after the first time decrease of the relevant market share of reusable drinks packaging an urgent need for action exists in Germany. This practise based analysis therefore deals with packaging-taxes as an alternative environmental policy instrument and points out recommendations against the background of a further amending of the German Packaging Ordinance as well as experiences from the use of packaging taxes in Europe.
Subjects:Packaging tax
waste management
mandatory deposit
non-ecologically advantageous one-way drinks packaging
environmental policy
JEL:C93
D44
D82
H41
L14
Q24
Q28
Q57
R52
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series in Economics, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
572960956.PDF307.26 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/28207

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.