|
EconStor >
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt a. M. >
Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27871
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Scholl, Wolfgang | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Schanz, Kay-Michael | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2008-12-19 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2009-09-10T13:57:12Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2009-09-10T13:57:12Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2008 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pi | | urn:nbn:de:101:1-2009011553 | | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27871 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | This article analyses the recent Leica judgement of the Higher Regional Court Frankfurt/Main and its consequences. In this judgement, the court has established an infringement of special formal requirements with respect to Leica´s invitation to the Annual General Meeting which, if correct, would bear dire consequences for a variety of listed companies, even in DAX. On the other hand, there is a recent decision of the Higher Regional Court Munich in a similar case concerning Hypovereinsbank, coming to the opposite conclusion. Besides the fact that, in the opinion of the authors, the Leica decision not only is legally unfounded and based on a completely unbalanced evaluation of formalistic requirements, it again proves the formalistic approach of German stock corporation law and leaves companies, especially with a respective regulation in their articles of association, their advisors and investors in a situation of uncertainty that has to be clarified urgently by the legislator. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | ger | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Frankfurt School of Finance & Management Frankfurt a. M. | | de |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Working paper series // Frankfurt School of Finance & Management 104 | | de |
| dc.subject.jel | | K12 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | K19 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | K22 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | K29 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Annual general meeting | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | invitation | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | power of attorney | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | authorization | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | written form | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Leica | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Hypovereinsbank | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Wella | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Aktionärsschutz in der AG falsch verstanden? Die Leica-Entscheidung des LG Frankfurt am Main | | de |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 585826072 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management
|
| Files in This Item:
| |
|
| No. of Downloads:
| |
| last Month |
last 3 Month |
total |
|
|
|
|
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|